Evidence found
179 records across 6 countries and territories, 1903–2026.
Pyrrhura molinae · GBIF taxon key 2479804
Where has the Green-cheeked Parakeet been recorded?
Pyrrhura molinae occurrence evidence comes from 179 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1903 to 2026. Most records come from Bolivia.
- 179 records
- 6 places
- 39 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
11 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19032026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Green-cheeked Parakeet has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Green-cheeked Parakeet. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Psittacidae.
Rose-ringed Parakeet
17,159 records
Monk Parakeet
4,216 records
Rainbow Lorikeet
1,867 records
Crimson Rosella
1,602 records
Eastern Rosella
1,318 records
Blue-headed Parrot
1,215 records
Sulphur-crested Cockatoo
1,207 records
Spectacled Parrotlet
1,090 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.