Evidence found
9,121 records across 2 countries and territories, 1894–2024.
Rattus fuscipes · GBIF taxon key 2439233
Where has the Australian Bush Rat been recorded?
Rattus fuscipes occurrence evidence comes from 9,121 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1894 to 2024. Most records come from Australia.
- 9,121 records
- 2 places
- 82 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-20. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18942024
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Australian Bush Rat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Australian Bush Rat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Muridae.
house mouse
26,983 records
black rat
11,025 records
Coucha Rat
6,522 records
Yellow-necked Mouse
4,544 records
Jackson's Praomys
3,065 records
African Arvicanthis
3,051 records
Typical Lemniscomys
2,443 records
Gracile Tateril
2,200 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.