Evidence found
10 records across 2 countries and territories.
Rejectaria villavicencia · GBIF taxon key 11592797
Where has the Rejectaria villavicencia been recorded?
Rejectaria villavicencia occurrence evidence comes from 10 records in 2 countries and territories. Most records come from St Kitts & Nevis.
- 10 records
- 2 places
- 0 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
0 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
historical describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Rejectaria villavicencia has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Rejectaria villavicencia. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| St Kitts & Nevis | 6 | |
| Mexico | 4 |
Related animals
Others in the family Erebidae.
Straw Dot
24,710 records
White Ermine
18,229 records
Burnet Companion
17,744 records
Ruby Tiger Moth
17,377 records
Snout
16,480 records
Buff ermine
9,646 records
Jersey Tiger
5,611 records
Black Witch
1,216 records
Record pattern: historical
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.