What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Rhyacophila fasciata been recorded?

Rhyacophila fasciata occurrence evidence comes from 3,446 records in 22 countries and territories, from 1861 to 2026. Most records come from Sweden.

InsectaTrichopteraRhyacophilidaeRhyacophila

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

3,446 records across 22 countries and territories, 1861–2026.

Rhyacophila fasciata · GBIF taxon key 1434133

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.

8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18612026

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Rhyacophila fasciata has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Rhyacophila fasciata. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Sweden 1,224
Austria 833
Hungary 699
Germany 409
Luxembourg 78
Greece 42
Finland 40
Romania 32
Slovakia 26
Denmark 17
France 14
Croatia 6
Bosnia & Herzegovina 5
Slovenia 5
Belgium 4
United Kingdom 3
Czechia 2
Spain 2
Italy 2
Bulgaria 1
Russia 1
Türkiye 1
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.