Evidence found
29 records across 5 countries and territories, 1912–2022.
Sclerophrys tuberosa · GBIF taxon key 10823804
Where has the Fernando Po toad been recorded?
Sclerophrys tuberosa occurrence evidence comes from 29 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1912 to 2022. Most records come from Congo.
- 29 records
- 5 places
- 8 years recorded
- Amphibia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: May.
3 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: May. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19122022
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Fernando Po toad has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Fernando Po toad. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Congo | 16 | |
| Equatorial Guinea | 6 | |
| Cameroon | 4 | |
| Angola | 2 | |
| Gabon | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Bufonidae.
Common Toad
41,184 records
Bufo toad
6,446 records
Green Toad
5,137 records
Common Sunda Toad
1,978 records
African Common Toad
1,802 records
Subdesert Toad
523 records
African common toad
521 records
Danatea Toad
128 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.