Evidence found
47 records across 3 countries and territories, 1949–2026.
Sitta himalayensis · GBIF taxon key 2484888
Where has the White-tailed Nuthatch been recorded?
Sitta himalayensis occurrence evidence comes from 47 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1949 to 2026. Most records come from India.
- 47 records
- 3 places
- 19 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: December.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: December. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19492026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where White-tailed Nuthatch has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for White-tailed Nuthatch. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Sittidae.
Eurasian Nuthatch
1,015,303 records
White-breasted Nuthatch
217,243 records
Red-breasted Nuthatch
98,649 records
Western Rock Nuthatch
116 records
Eastern Rock Nuthatch
14 records
Algerian Nuthatch
1 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.