Evidence found
15 records across 4 countries and territories, 1960–2019.
Spiloptila clamans · GBIF taxon key 9780994
Where has the Cricket Longtail been recorded?
Spiloptila clamans occurrence evidence comes from 15 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1960 to 2019. Most records come from Senegal.
- 15 records
- 4 places
- 3 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
3 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Cricket Longtail has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Cricket Longtail. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Senegal | 7 | |
| Chad | 6 | |
| Western Sahara | 1 | |
| Kenya | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Cisticolidae.
Zitting Cisticola
7,109 records
Green-backed Camaroptera
1,610 records
Common Tailorbird
1,473 records
Rattling Cisticola
657 records
Croaking Cisticola
476 records
Grey-backed Camaroptera
450 records
Chubb's Cisticola
400 records
Wailing Cisticola
380 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.