Evidence found
84 records across 8 countries and territories, 1902–2026.
Stachyridopsis ruficeps · GBIF taxon key 7340299
Where has the Rufous-capped Babbler been recorded?
Stachyridopsis ruficeps occurrence evidence comes from 84 records in 8 countries and territories, from 1902 to 2026. Most records come from Taiwan.
- 84 records
- 8 places
- 30 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
9 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19022026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Rufous-capped Babbler has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Rufous-capped Babbler. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Timaliidae.
Striped Tit-Babbler
371 records
Chestnut-winged Babbler
228 records
Rusty-cheeked Scimitar Babbler
39 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.