Evidence found
129 records across 10 countries and territories, 1929–2023.
Stolephorus waitei · GBIF taxon key 2414182
Where has the Spotty-face anchovy been recorded?
Stolephorus waitei occurrence evidence comes from 129 records in 10 countries and territories, from 1929 to 2023. Most records come from Bangladesh.
- 129 records
- 10 places
- 18 years recorded
- — class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19292023
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Spotty-face anchovy has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Spotty-face anchovy. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 75 | |
| Australia | 20 | |
| Philippines | 12 | |
| Taiwan | 9 | |
| India | 3 | |
| Papua New Guinea | 3 | |
| Indonesia | 2 | |
| Palau | 2 | |
| Vanuatu | 2 | |
| New Caledonia | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Engraulidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.