Evidence found
82 records across 3 countries and territories, 1893–2026.
Todus subulatus · GBIF taxon key 9598502
Where has the Broad-billed Tody been recorded?
Todus subulatus occurrence evidence comes from 82 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1893 to 2026. Most records come from Dominican Republic.
- 82 records
- 3 places
- 17 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18932026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Broad-billed Tody has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Broad-billed Tody. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Dominican Republic | 61 | |
| Haiti | 20 | |
| Canada | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Todidae.
Puerto Rican Tody
775 records
Cuban Tody
106 records
Narrow-billed Tody
26 records
Jamaican Tody
14 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.