Evidence found
25 records across 4 countries and territories, 1974–2002.
Trochocyathus cepulla · GBIF taxon key 2259145
Where has the Trochocyathus cepulla been recorded?
Trochocyathus cepulla occurrence evidence comes from 25 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1974 to 2002. Most records come from New Zealand.
- 25 records
- 4 places
- 5 years recorded
- Anthozoa class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19742002
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Trochocyathus cepulla has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Trochocyathus cepulla. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 12 | |
| Norfolk Island | 8 | |
| New Caledonia | 4 | |
| Australia | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Caryophylliidae.
Conotrochus brunneus
400 records
Bourneotrochus stellulatus
153 records
Caryophyllia abrupta
115 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.