Evidence found
96 records across 7 countries and territories, 1924–2026.
Turtur abyssinicus · GBIF taxon key 5231791
Where has the Black-billed Wood-Dove been recorded?
Turtur abyssinicus occurrence evidence comes from 96 records in 7 countries and territories, from 1924 to 2026. Most records come from Senegal.
- 96 records
- 7 places
- 17 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
10 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19242026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Black-billed Wood-Dove has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Black-billed Wood-Dove. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Columbidae.
Common Wood-Pigeon
1,497,255 records
Stock Dove
447,260 records
Rock Pigeon
422,908 records
Eurasian Collared-Dove
416,472 records
Mourning Dove
409,248 records
European Turtle-Dove
38,534 records
Oriental Turtle-Dove
33,074 records
White-winged Dove
20,193 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.