Evidence found
317 records across 4 countries and territories, 1909–2016.
Tylonycteris pachypus · GBIF taxon key 2432343
Where has the Club-footed Bat been recorded?
Tylonycteris pachypus occurrence evidence comes from 317 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1909 to 2016. Most records come from Malaysia.
- 317 records
- 4 places
- 27 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: December.
9 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: December. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19092016
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Club-footed Bat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Club-footed Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 292 | |
| Philippines | 19 | |
| Indonesia | 4 | |
| Thailand | 2 |
Related animals
Others in the family Vespertilionidae.
Common Pipistrelle
33,835 records
Noctule Bat
28,476 records
Kuhl's pipistrelle
1,130 records
Banana Bat
1,055 records
Savi's Pipistrelle
421 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.