Evidence found
76 records across 3 countries and territories, 1953–2025.
Uranotaenia apicalis · GBIF taxon key 1654348
Where has the Uranotaenia apicalis been recorded?
Uranotaenia apicalis occurrence evidence comes from 76 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1953 to 2025. Most records come from French Guiana.
- 76 records
- 3 places
- 3 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Uranotaenia apicalis has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Uranotaenia apicalis. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| French Guiana | 73 | |
| Brazil | 2 | |
| Panama | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Culicidae.
Asian tiger mosquito
65,152 records
yellow fever mosquito
34,349 records
southern house mosquito
7,738 records
Coquillettidia venezuelensis
4,796 records
Northern House Mosquito
4,660 records
Vexans Mosquito
4,602 records
Anopheles gambiae
3,480 records
Deinocerites magnus
3,357 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.