Evidence found
394 records across 9 countries and territories, 1931–2023.
Uroderma convexum · GBIF taxon key 7394938
Where has the Pacific Tent-making Bat been recorded?
Uroderma convexum occurrence evidence comes from 394 records in 9 countries and territories, from 1931 to 2023. Most records come from Panama.
- 394 records
- 9 places
- 33 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-21. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19312023
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Pacific Tent-making Bat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Pacific Tent-making Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Panama | 192 | |
| Colombia | 53 | |
| Honduras | 52 | |
| Venezuela | 37 | |
| Nicaragua | 28 | |
| Costa Rica | 21 | |
| Belize | 5 | |
| Mexico | 5 | |
| Ecuador | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Phyllostomidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.