Evidence found
356 records across 5 countries and territories, 1926–1983.
Uroderma davisi · GBIF taxon key 8316062
Where has the Davis's Tent-making Bat been recorded?
Uroderma davisi occurrence evidence comes from 356 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1926 to 1983. Most records come from Costa Rica.
- 356 records
- 5 places
- 21 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
10 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
historical describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19261983
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Davis's Tent-making Bat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Davis's Tent-making Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Costa Rica | 100 | |
| Mexico | 98 | |
| El Salvador | 80 | |
| Honduras | 61 | |
| Guatemala | 17 |
Related animals
Others in the family Phyllostomidae.
Record pattern: historical
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.