Evidence found
138 records across 5 countries and territories, 2006–2026.
Xenocatantops humilis · GBIF taxon key 1702765
Where has the Rufous-legged Grasshopper been recorded?
Xenocatantops humilis occurrence evidence comes from 138 records in 5 countries and territories, from 2006 to 2026. Most records come from Singapore.
- 138 records
- 5 places
- 13 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
20062026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Rufous-legged Grasshopper has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Rufous-legged Grasshopper. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Acrididae.
Meadow Grasshopper
43,635 records
bow-winged grasshopper
28,419 records
Rufous Grasshopper
5,062 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.