Evidence found
43 records across 2 countries and territories, 1964–2025.
Zosterops olivaceus · GBIF taxon key 2489386
Where has the Reunion White-eye been recorded?
Zosterops olivaceus occurrence evidence comes from 43 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1964 to 2025. Most records come from Réunion.
- 43 records
- 2 places
- 6 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
3 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19642025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Reunion White-eye has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Reunion White-eye. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Zosteropidae.
Silver-eye
3,558 records
Japanese White-eye
2,983 records
African Yellow White-eye
747 records
Oriental White-eye
260 records
Swinhoe's White-eye
251 records
Cape White-eye
239 records
Whiskered Yuhina
110 records
Madagascar White-eye
84 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.