Evidence found
76 records across 4 countries and territories, 1963–2020.
Afrixalus delicatus · GBIF taxon key 2426573
Where has the Delicate Leaf-folding Frog been recorded?
Afrixalus delicatus occurrence evidence comes from 76 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1963 to 2020. Most records come from Somalia.
- 76 records
- 4 places
- 8 years recorded
- Amphibia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: October.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: October. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19632020
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Delicate Leaf-folding Frog has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Delicate Leaf-folding Frog. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Somalia | 45 | |
| Kenya | 19 | |
| Mozambique | 10 | |
| South Africa | 2 |
Related animals
Others in the family Hyperoliidae.
Moller's Gulf Frog
877 records
Golden-eyed Reed Frog
579 records
Drewes' Reed Frog
405 records
Seychelles Island Frog
11 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.