Evidence found
42 records across 4 countries and territories.
Barbus rajanorum · GBIF taxon key 9032552
Where has the Barbus rajanorum been recorded?
Barbus rajanorum occurrence evidence comes from 42 records in 4 countries and territories. Most records come from Iran.
- 42 records
- 4 places
- 0 years recorded
- — class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
0 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
historical describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Barbus rajanorum has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Barbus rajanorum. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Cyprinidae.
Roach
537,565 records
Minnow
111,441 records
Gudgeon
75,371 records
European chub
32,362 records
Topmouth Gudgeon
28,101 records
Goldfish
19,157 records
Freshwater Sprat
11,139 records
Korean Dark Chub
3,010 records
Record pattern: historical
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.