What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Ruwenzori Batis been recorded?

Batis diops occurrence evidence comes from 156 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1964 to 2024. Most records come from Uganda.

AvesPasseriformesPlatysteiridaeBatis

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

156 records across 4 countries and territories, 1964–2024.

Batis diops · GBIF taxon key 5231171

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.

10 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

19642024

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Ruwenzori Batis has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Ruwenzori Batis. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Uganda 118
Burundi 15
DR Congo 13
Rwanda 10

Related animals

Others in the family Platysteiridae.

Chinspot Batis
Chinspot Batis
405 records
Brown-throated Wattle-eye
Brown-throated Wattle-eye
364 records
Pririt Batis
Pririt Batis
130 records
Chestnut Wattle-eye
Chestnut Wattle-eye
42 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.