Evidence found
57 records across 1 countries and territories, 1930–2026.
Calicalicus madagascariensis · GBIF taxon key 2495102
Where has the Red-tailed Vanga been recorded?
Calicalicus madagascariensis occurrence evidence comes from 57 records in 1 countries and territories, from 1930 to 2026. Most records come from Madagascar.
- 57 records
- 1 places
- 20 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
11 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19302026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Red-tailed Vanga has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Red-tailed Vanga. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Madagascar | 57 |
Related animals
Others in the family Vangidae.
Common Newtonia
124 records
Hook-billed Vanga
60 records
Tylas Vanga
44 records
Chabert Vanga
38 records
Blue Vanga
24 records
White-headed Vanga
17 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.