Evidence found
38 records across 1 countries and territories, 1929–2026.
Leptopterus chabert · GBIF taxon key 5231780
Where has the Chabert Vanga been recorded?
Leptopterus chabert occurrence evidence comes from 38 records in 1 countries and territories, from 1929 to 2026. Most records come from Madagascar.
- 38 records
- 1 places
- 15 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
9 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19292026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Chabert Vanga has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Chabert Vanga. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Madagascar | 38 |
Related animals
Others in the family Vangidae.
Common Newtonia
124 records
Hook-billed Vanga
60 records
Red-tailed Vanga
57 records
Tylas Vanga
44 records
Blue Vanga
24 records
White-headed Vanga
17 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.