Evidence found
106 records across 2 countries and territories, 2004–2025.
Chrysoblephus puniceus · GBIF taxon key 2392434
Where has the Slinger been recorded?
Chrysoblephus puniceus occurrence evidence comes from 106 records in 2 countries and territories, from 2004 to 2025. Most records come from Mozambique.
- 106 records
- 2 places
- 4 years recorded
- — class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
20042025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Slinger has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Slinger. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Mozambique | 69 | |
| South Africa | 37 |
Related animals
Others in the family Sparidae.
White seabream
550 records
Bluespotted seabream
432 records
Salema
373 records
Black seabream
345 records
Bream
336 records
Breca
308 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.