Evidence found
85 records across 4 countries and territories, 1977–2025.
Conocephalus cinereus · GBIF taxon key 5095723
Where has the Caribbean meadow katydid been recorded?
Conocephalus cinereus occurrence evidence comes from 85 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1977 to 2025. Most records come from Costa Rica.
- 85 records
- 4 places
- 17 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19772025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Caribbean meadow katydid has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Caribbean meadow katydid. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Costa Rica | 37 | |
| Bonaire | 31 | |
| United States | 13 | |
| Dominican Republic | 4 |
Related animals
Others in the family Tettigoniidae.
Great Green Bush Cricket
50,907 records
Dark Bush Cricket
33,196 records
Roesel's Bush Cricket
11,348 records
Schmidt's Marbled Bush-cricket
87 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.