Evidence found
298 records across 14 countries and territories, 1896–2026.
Culicicapa ceylonensis · GBIF taxon key 2492634
Where has the Gray-headed Canary-Flycatcher been recorded?
Culicicapa ceylonensis occurrence evidence comes from 298 records in 14 countries and territories, from 1896 to 2026. Most records come from India.
- 298 records
- 14 places
- 62 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: February.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: February. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18962026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Gray-headed Canary-Flycatcher has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Gray-headed Canary-Flycatcher. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| India | 68 | |
| Thailand | 57 | |
| Malaysia | 47 | |
| Laos | 29 | |
| China | 28 | |
| Vietnam | 19 | |
| Indonesia | 14 | |
| Nepal | 10 | |
| Hong Kong | 9 | |
| Myanmar | 8 | |
| Bhutan | 4 | |
| Sri Lanka | 3 | |
| Bangladesh | 1 | |
| Cambodia | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Stenostiridae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.