Evidence found
47 records across 7 countries and territories, 1907–2026.
Emberiza buchanani · GBIF taxon key 9566476
Where has the Gray-necked Bunting been recorded?
Emberiza buchanani occurrence evidence comes from 47 records in 7 countries and territories, from 1907 to 2026. Most records come from Russia.
- 47 records
- 7 places
- 13 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
3 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19072026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Gray-necked Bunting has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Gray-necked Bunting. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Emberizidae.
Yellow-throated Bunting
12,859 records
Cirl Bunting
10,104 records
Little Bunting
9,762 records
Meadow Bunting
4,906 records
Rock Bunting
2,834 records
Black-faced Bunting
1,883 records
Black-headed Bunting
852 records
Golden-breasted Bunting
287 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.