Evidence found
388 records across 5 countries and territories, 1866–2026.
Embernagra platensis · GBIF taxon key 2492002
Where has the Great Pampa-Finch been recorded?
Embernagra platensis occurrence evidence comes from 388 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1866 to 2026. Most records come from Argentina.
- 388 records
- 5 places
- 53 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18662026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Great Pampa-Finch has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Great Pampa-Finch. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Thraupidae.
Blue-gray Tanager
7,837 records
Bananaquit
7,737 records
Blue-black Grassquit
5,333 records
Palm Tanager
5,079 records
Saffron Finch
4,025 records
Yellow-bellied Seedeater
3,471 records
Crimson-backed Tanager
3,465 records
Yellow-faced Grassquit
3,138 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.