Evidence found
326 records across 3 countries and territories, 1901–2014.
Eumops patagonicus · GBIF taxon key 7261927
Where has the Patagonian Dwarf Bonneted Bat been recorded?
Eumops patagonicus occurrence evidence comes from 326 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1901 to 2014. Most records come from Bolivia.
- 326 records
- 3 places
- 12 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
9 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19012014
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Patagonian Dwarf Bonneted Bat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Patagonian Dwarf Bonneted Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Molossidae.
Mexican free-tailed bat
11,675 records
Velvety free-tailed bat
4,044 records
Little Free-tailed Bat
2,624 records
Angolan free-tailed bat
1,792 records
Seychelles Free-tailed Bat
324 records
Natal Free-tailed Bat
229 records
Reunion Little Mastiff Bat
95 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.