Evidence found
35 records across 4 countries and territories, 1909–2025.
Garrulax albogularis · GBIF taxon key 2493453
Where has the white-throated laughing thrush been recorded?
Garrulax albogularis occurrence evidence comes from 35 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1909 to 2025. Most records come from India.
- 35 records
- 4 places
- 16 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: December.
8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: December. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19092025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where white-throated laughing thrush has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for white-throated laughing thrush. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Leiothrichidae.
Jungle Babbler
773 records
Arrow-marked Babbler
301 records
Chinese Hwamei
129 records
Brown Babbler
112 records
Common Babbler
101 records
Rufous Sibia
97 records
Chestnut-crowned Laughingthrush
90 records
Yellow-billed Babbler
63 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.