Evidence found
49 records across 5 countries and territories, 1931–2026.
Halictus jucundus · GBIF taxon key 1353302
Where has the Pleasing Metallic-Furrow bee been recorded?
Halictus jucundus occurrence evidence comes from 49 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1931 to 2026. Most records come from DR Congo.
- 49 records
- 5 places
- 6 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
6 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19312026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Pleasing Metallic-Furrow bee has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Pleasing Metallic-Furrow bee. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| DR Congo | 30 | |
| Ghana | 12 | |
| South Africa | 5 | |
| Angola | 1 | |
| Zimbabwe | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Halictidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.