Evidence found
21 records across 4 countries and territories, 2008–2024.
Halictus resurgens · GBIF taxon key 1353207
Where has the Halictus resurgens been recorded?
Halictus resurgens occurrence evidence comes from 21 records in 4 countries and territories, from 2008 to 2024. Most records come from Armenia.
- 21 records
- 4 places
- 4 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
20082024
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Halictus resurgens has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Halictus resurgens. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Halictidae.
Brassy Mining Bee
10,627 records
Slender Mining Bee
7,023 records
Broad-faced Furrow Bee
900 records
Pleasing Metallic-Furrow bee
49 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.