Evidence found
127 records across 10 countries and territories, 1867–2026.
Hemipus picatus · GBIF taxon key 2486748
Where has the Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike been recorded?
Hemipus picatus occurrence evidence comes from 127 records in 10 countries and territories, from 1867 to 2026. Most records come from Thailand.
- 127 records
- 10 places
- 40 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18672026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Bar-winged Flycatcher-shrike. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 55 | |
| India | 21 | |
| Malaysia | 14 | |
| Laos | 10 | |
| Nepal | 9 | |
| Sri Lanka | 8 | |
| Vietnam | 5 | |
| Indonesia | 2 | |
| Bangladesh | 1 | |
| Bhutan | 1 |
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.