Evidence found
22 records across 2 countries and territories, 1952–2026.
Histurgops ruficauda · GBIF taxon key 2492355
Where has the Rufous-tailed Weaver been recorded?
Histurgops ruficauda occurrence evidence comes from 22 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1952 to 2026. Most records come from Tanzania.
- 22 records
- 2 places
- 11 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19522026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Rufous-tailed Weaver has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Rufous-tailed Weaver. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Passeridae.
House Sparrow
853,837 records
Eurasian Tree Sparrow
741,043 records
Rock Petronia
2,275 records
Spanish Sparrow
1,691 records
Northern Gray-headed Sparrow
485 records
Cape Sparrow
439 records
White-browed Sparrow-Weaver
384 records
Cape Verde Sparrow
248 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.