What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Hydroporus planus been recorded?

Hydroporus planus occurrence evidence comes from 8,041 records in 14 countries and territories, from 1839 to 2026. Most records come from United Kingdom.

InsectaColeopteraDytiscidaeHydroporus

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

8,041 records across 14 countries and territories, 1839–2026.

Hydroporus planus · GBIF taxon key 4470085

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-20. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.

10 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18392026

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Hydroporus planus has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Hydroporus planus. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
United Kingdom 5,575
Netherlands 1,229
Sweden 556
Spain 280
Ireland 161
Luxembourg 92
Austria 59
Germany 45
Isle of Man 29
Belgium 7
Denmark 3
France 2
Italy 2
Portugal 1

Related animals

Others in the family Dytiscidae.

Hydaticus leander
140 records
Methles cribratellus
38 records
Hyphydrus impressus
12 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.