Evidence found
300 records across 7 countries and territories, 1909–2023.
Hypseleotris cyprinoides · GBIF taxon key 2386337
Where has the Tropical carp-gudgeon been recorded?
Hypseleotris cyprinoides occurrence evidence comes from 300 records in 7 countries and territories, from 1909 to 2023. Most records come from South Africa.
- 300 records
- 7 places
- 11 years recorded
- — class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-21. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19092023
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Tropical carp-gudgeon has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Tropical carp-gudgeon. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 281 | |
| Philippines | 8 | |
| Palau | 3 | |
| Solomon Islands | 3 | |
| Indonesia | 2 | |
| Papua New Guinea | 2 | |
| Fiji | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Eleotridae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.