Evidence found
35 records across 4 countries and territories, 1961–1997.
Kerivoula picta · GBIF taxon key 2432543
Where has the Painted Woolly Bat been recorded?
Kerivoula picta occurrence evidence comes from 35 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1961 to 1997. Most records come from Nepal.
- 35 records
- 4 places
- 3 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
historical describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Painted Woolly Bat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Painted Woolly Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Vespertilionidae.
Common Pipistrelle
33,835 records
Noctule Bat
28,476 records
Kuhl's pipistrelle
1,130 records
Banana Bat
1,055 records
Savi's Pipistrelle
421 records
Record pattern: historical
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.