Evidence found
27 records across 3 countries and territories, 1924–2026.
Lamprotornis pulcher · GBIF taxon key 2489087
Where has the Chestnut-bellied Starling been recorded?
Lamprotornis pulcher occurrence evidence comes from 27 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1924 to 2026. Most records come from Senegal.
- 27 records
- 3 places
- 5 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19242026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Chestnut-bellied Starling has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Chestnut-bellied Starling. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Sturnidae.
European Starling
1,403,454 records
Rosy Starling
5,490 records
White-cheeked Starling
5,058 records
Common Myna
3,903 records
Spotless Starling
3,083 records
Asian Pied Starling
1,118 records
Violet-backed Starling
538 records
Metallic Starling
474 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.