What Animal Lives Where

Where has the White-footed Furrow Bee been recorded?

Lasioglossum leucopus occurrence evidence comes from 7,856 records in 9 countries and territories, from 1800 to 2026. Most records come from Sweden.

InsectaHymenopteraHalictidaeLasioglossum

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

7,856 records across 9 countries and territories, 1800–2026.

Lasioglossum leucopus · GBIF taxon key 1353834

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.

4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18002026

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where White-footed Furrow Bee has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for White-footed Furrow Bee. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Sweden 7,242
Finland 233
United Kingdom 226
Austria 52
Belgium 41
Luxembourg 41
Netherlands 14
France 6
Russia 1

Related animals

Others in the family Halictidae.

Brassy Mining Bee
10,627 records
Slender Mining Bee
Slender Mining Bee
7,023 records
Broad-faced Furrow Bee
900 records
Pleasing Metallic-Furrow bee
49 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.