Evidence found
1,720 records across 9 countries and territories, 1877–2026.
Lepidothrix coronata · GBIF taxon key 5230528
Where has the Blue-crowned Manakin been recorded?
Lepidothrix coronata occurrence evidence comes from 1,720 records in 9 countries and territories, from 1877 to 2026. Most records come from Peru.
- 1,720 records
- 9 places
- 91 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-21. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18772026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Blue-crowned Manakin has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Blue-crowned Manakin. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 771 | |
| Colombia | 517 | |
| Ecuador | 119 | |
| Brazil | 101 | |
| Bolivia | 75 | |
| Costa Rica | 50 | |
| Venezuela | 43 | |
| Panama | 42 | |
| United States | 2 |
Related animals
Others in the family Pipridae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.