Evidence found
42 records across 2 countries and territories, 2001–2015.
Lygodactylus thomensis · GBIF taxon key 2446662
Where has the Annobon Dwarf Gecko been recorded?
Lygodactylus thomensis occurrence evidence comes from 42 records in 2 countries and territories, from 2001 to 2015. Most records come from São Tomé & Príncipe.
- 42 records
- 2 places
- 6 years recorded
- Squamata class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
20012015
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Annobon Dwarf Gecko has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Annobon Dwarf Gecko. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| São Tomé & Príncipe | 39 | |
| Equatorial Guinea | 3 |
Related animals
Others in the family Gekkonidae.
Common House Gecko
8,148 records
Sad Gecko
6,537 records
Turkish Gecko
3,559 records
Cosmopolitan House Gecko
2,716 records
Stump-Toed Gecko
2,646 records
Ocean Gecko
1,556 records
Tokay gecko
814 records
Pelagic Gecko
743 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.