What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Macrosteles laevis been recorded?

Macrosteles laevis occurrence evidence comes from 303 records in 13 countries and territories, from 1984 to 2026. Most records come from Sweden.

InsectaHemipteraCicadellidaeMacrosteles

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

303 records across 13 countries and territories, 1984–2026.

Macrosteles laevis · GBIF taxon key 2039616

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: August.

4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: August. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

19842026

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Macrosteles laevis has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Macrosteles laevis. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Sweden 119
Germany 54
Luxembourg 31
Iceland 26
Netherlands 17
United Kingdom 16
Austria 11
Belgium 9
Switzerland 7
Czechia 6
Italy 3
Finland 2
Poland 2

Related animals

Others in the family Cicadellidae.

Leafhopper
Leafhopper
403 records
Amrasca biguttula
27 records
Sugarcane planthopper
17 records
Diplocolenus frauenfeldi
5 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.