Evidence found
3 records across 1 countries and territories, 1995–2016.
Otus hartlaubi · GBIF taxon key 5232244
Where has the Sao Tome Scops-Owl been recorded?
Otus hartlaubi occurrence evidence comes from 3 records in 1 countries and territories, from 1995 to 2016. Most records come from São Tomé & Príncipe.
- 3 records
- 1 places
- 2 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
one-off describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Sao Tome Scops-Owl has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Sao Tome Scops-Owl. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| São Tomé & Príncipe | 3 |
Related animals
Others in the family Strigidae.
Boreal Owl
71,959 records
Little Owl
44,032 records
Burrowing Owl
3,897 records
Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl
1,902 records
Spotted Owlet
651 records
Oriental Scops-Owl
237 records
Asian Barred Owlet
117 records
Christmas Island Boobook
85 records
Record pattern: one-off
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.