Evidence found
9 records across 6 countries and territories, 1969–2025.
Phalacrocorax nigrogularis · GBIF taxon key 2481894
Where has the Socotra Cormorant been recorded?
Phalacrocorax nigrogularis occurrence evidence comes from 9 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1969 to 2025. Most records come from BH.
- 9 records
- 6 places
- 6 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
7 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19692025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Socotra Cormorant has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Socotra Cormorant. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Phalacrocoracidae.
Great Cormorant
1,066,924 records
European Shag
60,602 records
Double-crested Cormorant
30,479 records
Neotropic Cormorant
4,362 records
Pygmy cormorant
1,554 records
Little Pied Cormorant
1,514 records
Little Cormorant
1,144 records
Little Black Cormorant
613 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.