Evidence found
61 records across 5 countries and territories, 1937–2026.
Phylloscopus chloronotus · GBIF taxon key 2493059
Where has the Pale-rumped Warbler been recorded?
Phylloscopus chloronotus occurrence evidence comes from 61 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1937 to 2026. Most records come from India.
- 61 records
- 5 places
- 17 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19372026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Pale-rumped Warbler has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Pale-rumped Warbler. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Phylloscopidae.
Willow Warbler
1,733,808 records
Common Chiffchaff
1,212,776 records
Wood Warbler
222,615 records
Yellow-browed Warbler
28,319 records
Greenish Warbler
22,377 records
Pallas's Leaf Warbler
12,705 records
Western Bonelli's Warbler
7,268 records
Arctic Warbler
6,620 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.