Evidence found
18 records across 1 countries and territories, 1995–2017.
Ploceus sanctithomae · GBIF taxon key 2494039
Where has the Sao Tome Weaver been recorded?
Ploceus sanctithomae occurrence evidence comes from 18 records in 1 countries and territories, from 1995 to 2017. Most records come from São Tomé & Príncipe.
- 18 records
- 1 places
- 3 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
3 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Sao Tome Weaver has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Sao Tome Weaver. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| São Tomé & Príncipe | 18 |
Related animals
Others in the family Ploceidae.
Village Weaver
1,745 records
Southern Masked-Weaver
740 records
Red-billed Quelea
643 records
Baglafecht Weaver
551 records
Northern Red Bishop
499 records
Southern Red Bishop
484 records
Spectacled Weaver
394 records
Black-headed Weaver
341 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.