What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Polyeunoa laevis been recorded?

Polyeunoa laevis occurrence evidence comes from 441 records in 9 countries and territories, from 1873 to 2013. Most records come from Antarctica.

PolychaetaPhyllodocidaPolynoidaePolyeunoa

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

441 records across 9 countries and territories, 1873–2013.

Polyeunoa laevis · GBIF taxon key 2314291

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-21. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.

9 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18732013

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Polyeunoa laevis has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Polyeunoa laevis. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Antarctica 337
South Georgia 50
Argentina 26
Falkland Islands 15
New Zealand 4
South Africa 4
Chile 2
United Kingdom 1
United States 1

Related animals

Others in the family Polynoidae.

Bylgides sarsi
1,130 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.