Evidence found
115 records across 6 countries and territories, 1983–2025.
Polymixis lichenea · GBIF taxon key 4533285
Where has the Feathered Ranunculus been recorded?
Polymixis lichenea occurrence evidence comes from 115 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1983 to 2025. Most records come from United Kingdom.
- 115 records
- 6 places
- 22 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: October.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: October. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19832025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Feathered Ranunculus has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Feathered Ranunculus. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Noctuidae.
Large Yellow Underwing
53,691 records
Silver Y
46,471 records
Setaceous Hebrew Character
34,102 records
Heart and Dart
33,113 records
Dark Arches
21,301 records
Flame Shoulder
20,619 records
Square-spot Rustic
20,011 records
Common Wainscot
16,888 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.