Evidence found
236 records across 3 countries and territories, 1896–2026.
Stephanophorus diadematus · GBIF taxon key 5230725
Where has the Diademed Tanager been recorded?
Stephanophorus diadematus occurrence evidence comes from 236 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1896 to 2026. Most records come from Argentina.
- 236 records
- 3 places
- 31 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
10 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18962026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Diademed Tanager has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Diademed Tanager. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Thraupidae.
Blue-gray Tanager
7,837 records
Bananaquit
7,737 records
Blue-black Grassquit
5,333 records
Palm Tanager
5,079 records
Saffron Finch
4,025 records
Yellow-bellied Seedeater
3,471 records
Crimson-backed Tanager
3,465 records
Yellow-faced Grassquit
3,138 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.