Evidence found
112 records across 6 countries and territories, 1926–2018.
Thermochoria equivocata · GBIF taxon key 1429535
Where has the Dash-winged Piedface been recorded?
Thermochoria equivocata occurrence evidence comes from 112 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1926 to 2018. Most records come from Nigeria.
- 112 records
- 6 places
- 13 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
9 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19262018
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Dash-winged Piedface has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Dash-winged Piedface. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Libellulidae.
Four-spotted Chaser
29,975 records
Keeled Skimmer
4,669 records
Globe Skimmer
4,494 records
Scarlet Dragonfly
3,859 records
Red-veined Darter
2,535 records
Green Marsh Hawk
1,574 records
Red-veined Dropwing
770 records
Violet Dropwing
506 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.